The Dat project, with hypercore lib and https://beakerbrowser.com/ are really promising!
Are there any tooters who played with it? Any feedbacks?
@nolan @taravancil @paul so many great people around here! π
@paul @taravancil
Hi you both :)
I found out via @nolan that you have joined the fediverse.
I really love the idea of #breaker #Browser. About it's existence I found out via mastodon. Is there something you're missing. You seem to not be active here anymore.
Or is it just that handeling many different social media accounts can be overwhelming and the fediverse yet is missing some popularity that you used to have from other accounts?
@Pierre I tried it out, but didn't visit any other dat:// websites other than my own. is there a list somewhere of some fun dat sites?
@matteodem @Pierre check out https://hashbase.io
@taravancil @paul The next few months will be quite busy for me, but I think I will have some real use case by the end of the summer. Anyway I'll follow the releases and might really soon start using it for a tiddlywiki!
Congratulations for your work!
@Pierre @taravancil Thanks!
@Pierre Yes, they are really cool! One of my apps uses Hypercore/Dat to share itβs data as a p2p, decentralized alternative to CSV and SQLite downloads. Iβm looking forward to creating Dat-native apps as soon as identity/crypto is added to Beaker (by @paul & @taravancil).
@22 @paul @taravancil I wonder how an authentication mechanism and authorization could be implemented for "non technical users". Something like https://auth0.com/blog/an-introduction-to-ethereum-and-smart-contracts-part-3/?
I am also starting to look at hypercore to use it as an event store for an app and it is promising also...
@Pierre @taravancil @22 Yes actually, we've been thinking something along those lines.
It's relatively simple, for instance, to have a user prove ownership of a Dat to a service (https://github.com/datprotocol/hypercloud/blob/master/docs/flows/dat-ownership-proof.md)
Building flows for binding dats to a service username is then straight-forward, and that's key distribution (more on that in a second)
@22 @taravancil @Pierre Authentication in a live session will be doable once you have a username->dat binding, since each dat is address by a keypair. Just have to be careful with the auth construction to avoid tricking the user into signing payloads that aren't related to authenticating a connection-session
@Pierre @taravancil @22 The other consideration about key-distribution is keeping the service honest
If I bind a dat to my 'bob' profile on 'fritter.com', then we expect 'fritter.com/bob' to provide the pubkey of the dat I gave-- but of course that's a trust issue
To help with that, we can have fritter.com distribute a hypercore logging all of its bindings, similar to in Certificate Transparency
@paul @22 @taravancil Thanks for these very interesting insights. I understand better how it could be achieved, and in the end there is this famous "trust issue" to be solved, but transparency is a fair solution indeed!
I've started to build some stuff with https://github.com/mafintosh/hyperpipe, which makes distributed event stores and streams super nice. I kinda used it to make a distributed tweet viewer thingy: https://hypertweet.glitch.me/, https://glitch.com/edit/#!/hypertweet?path=README.md:1:0
Docs on hyperpipe need some love (they haven't reflected recent changes), I'll try to update those soon.
@joehand @22 @paul @taravancil I am not sure it really is a problem -> https://github.com/mafintosh/hyperpipe/blob/f92746e044f152ef37a255517e7f6b42afa291df/index.js
@Pierre Do @paul and @taravancil count? They're the primary authors π